James Lazar Braathen represents a rare position in contemporary Nordic fashion: emotionally maximal, structurally controlled, and deliberately unbothered by Scandinavian branding expectations.
In conversation, he rejects fixed identity in favour of “daydreamed” construction, framing fashion as obsession-driven authorship rather than product design. His silhouettes combine disciplined sensuality with historical romanticism, while his references move between Oslo’s architectural fragments and cinematic European nostalgia.
The result is a designer operating in tension—between elegance and excess, feminism and fantasy, control and creative possession. Not Scandinavian minimalism. Something sharper, stranger, and far less obedient

Benedicte Aubert Ringnes’ “ARNOLD” positions the body as both icon and image-system—where bodybuilding, classical sculpture, and digital collage collapse into a single visual language of control and distortion. Presented at Gallery A, Oslo, the exhibition reworks Arnold Schwarzenegger not as celebrity, but as cultural framework: a figure through which masculinity, symmetry, and spectacle are continuously reframed under post-digital conditions. Drawing on pop art lineage, experimental film, and Photoshop-based construction, Ringnes produces works that resist resolution in favour of layered instability. The result is a sharply contemporary inquiry into how images construct power, and how power is sustained through repetition, editing, and visual myth.

THERAPEUTIC DENIM NYC

HE ESTABLISHED WWW.CACHOFALCON.COM AS A WAY TO SHOW HIS WORK AND MEANS TO CONTINUE GATHERING STORIES FROM OTHERS. FALCON DISCOVERED IT WAS MUCH EASIER FOR PEOPLE TO SHARE THEIR DARK EXPERIENCES WITH A STRANGER. HE RECEIVED MANY ANONYMOUS EMAILS FROM PEOPLE TELLING THEIR STORIES OF LOSS, HOPE, REGRET, AND LOVE, WHICH IN COMBINATION WITH HIS OWN PERSONAL STORIES, BECAME THE BASIS FOR A MASSIVE COLLECTION OF DRAWINGS AND PAINTINGS.

BØSE BUBEN drops into Berlin’s queer nightlife where documentary photography stops behaving and starts participating. Between sweat, bass, and half-lit bodies, Andreas Rød’s lens and Arthur Sopin’s framing capture intimacy as instability — desire without explanation, identity without closure. Part Nan Goldin tenderness, part Berlin industrial edge, the work refuses clean narrative in favour of contact, friction, and fleeting exposure. Nothing is staged for comfort. Everything is held long enough to feel real — and slightly out of control.

A razor-sharp portrait of Clayton Patterson and the Lower East Side as a battleground of culture, law, and survival — where art was not a career but evidence of a city in freefall and reinvention. From police surveillance and court battles to the rise of gentrification and curated “authenticity,” Patterson’s archive exposes how urban life is documented, controlled, and ultimately rewritten. A story about New York then — and every major city now — asking a brutal question: who owns reality when the streets are no longer affordable to live in, only to consume?

Arthur Sopin & Andreas Rod’s No, It Is Not; Not Always (DT500mag, London) is a sharp post-conceptual rupture disguised as an exhibition — where portraiture, performance, and moving image collapse into controlled instability. Born from a 150+ artist open call, it reframes eccentricity as structure, not exception, and turns identity into a flickering system rather than a fixed subject. Positioned between Venice Biennale discourse and post-internet fatigue, it doesn’t explain the contemporary condition — it destabilises it, elegantly and without apology.

” IS IT IMPORTANT TO BE A SEER? MAKE ONESELF A SEER? THE ARTIST BECOMES A SEER THROUGH A LONG, BOUNDLESS AND REASONED EXPLOSION OF ALL THE SENSES. ALL SHAPES OF LOVE SUFFERING AND ALL KINDS OF MADNESS. HE SEARCHES HIMSELF, HE EXHAUSTS ALL POISONS IN HIMSELF, TO PURE HIS UNIQUE QUINTESSENCES. A HEAVY TORTURE WHERE HE BECOMES AMONG ALL MEN THE GREAT PATIENT, THE GREAT CRIMINAL, THE GREAT ACCUSED ONE -AND THE SUPREME SCHOLAR! THUS HE REACHES THE UNKNOWN!… -THE ARTIST, A THIEF OF FIRE! “

Shoot Gallery’s new space in Oslo’s Barcode district reframes fine art photography as infrastructure rather than display—where curatorial authorship, branding logic, and market intelligence converge into a single, controlled visual system. At the centre, Helene Gulaker Hansen articulates a distinctly European model of the gallery: less white cube, more editorial machine for producing photographic value, taste, and international legibility.

CREEPER CREEPER BY DAMEHT. NYC

” A NEW VIDEO FOR THEIR SINGLE “CREEPER CREEPER” AND IT’S A CAMPY BLAST. TAKING CULTURAL HINTS FROM THE LIKES OF STEVE STRANGE, SOO THE CAT WOMAN AND NEW ROMANTICISM, THE VIDEO IS A VISUAL TREAT AND AN APPROPRIATE ODE FOR A BAND KNOWN BEST FOR THEIR SECRET SHOWS.” NYLON MAGAZINE

Anthony Lister, the celebrated Australian painter and installation artist known for his provocative blend of high and lowbrow culture, is set to unveil his latest body of work in a highly anticipated exhibition in Sydney. Lister’s artistry transcends conventional boundaries, drawing inspiration from street art, expressionism, and contemporary youth culture. His work has garnered international acclaim, with solo exhibitions across Australia, the United States, Europe, and the UK.

ANTHONY LISTER THE LOWBROW-O. SYDNEY

THIS EPISODE IS ABOUT A GRAFFITI WRITER, RISK, NEW IMAGE ART GALLERY OWNER MARSEE GOLDBERG, DIRECTOR MARK SIMPSON, AND PERFORMANCE ARTIST ARIEL BRICKMAN TALKING ABOUT LISTER’S INCREDIBLE STYLE AND DEDICATION TO HIS TRUE LOVE AND ARTISTIC EXPRESSION.

Stefan has spent a lifetime looking at the world through the frame of a camera—but insists photography was never really about images. It was always about questions. In this wide-ranging conversation, the veteran photojournalist reflects on philosophy, technology and the unsettling speed at which truth itself is being rewritten. From the ethics of artificial intelligence to the fragility of perception in an image-saturated age, he argues that the real crisis is not information overload, but the erosion of critical thinking. Neither utopian nor dystopian, his view of the future is disarmingly simple: technology is neutral—people are not.